We previously reported that after a public meeting held on May 25, 2017, the FDA’s Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) recommended Pfizer’s proposed biosimilar to Amgen’s Epogen®/Procrit® for approval across all indications. The ODAC committee voted 14-1 in favor of approval of Pfizer’s application.
Surprisingly, however, the FDA did not approve the application as expected.
On June 22, 2017, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (“CHMP”) of the European Medicine’s Agency (“EMA”) recommended Samsung Bioepis’ Imraldi® (SB-5, adalimumab), a biosimilar to AbbVie’s Humira®, for approval. The CHMP’s recommendation will be referred to the European Commission for final marketing authorization.
Adalimumab is a TNF (tumor necrosis factor) inhibitor
Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics announced that its Medical Marketing Application (“MMA”) for FKB327, a biosimilar to AbbVie’s Humira® (adalimumab), has been accepted for review by the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”). Adalimumab is a TNF (tumor necrosis factor) inhibitor that binds to TNF-alpha (TNF-α), preventing it from activating TNF receptors, which cause the inflammatory reactions associated
The FDA announced yesterday that the Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (“ODAC”) has scheduled a public meeting to review ABP 215, Amgen’s proposed biosimilar to Genentech’s Avastin (bevacizumab), on July 13, 2017. According to the announcement, the proposed indications and uses for ABP 215 include:
On May 25, 2017, Pfizer, Inc. (“Pfizer”) filed two new petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 6,407,213 (“the ’213 patent”). The ‘213 patent, entitled “Method for Making Humanized Antibodies,” issued on June 18, 2002. Although the IPR petitions do not identify a particular biologic, Genentech has publicly stated that the technology
Pfizer announced last week that the FDA’s Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) recommended its proposed biosimilar to Amgen’s Epogen®/Procrit® for approval across all indications after a public meeting held on May 25, 2017. The meeting materials are available from the FDA’s website here.
The history of this application is interesting. The original biologics application
Earlier this month, Janssen Biotech, Inc., a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson, (“Janssen” or “Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. (“Samsung Bioepis” or “Defendant”), a joint venture between Samsung Biologics and Biogen. The patent infringement litigation relates to Samsung Bioepis’s
Partner Nikki Gifford gave a presentation entitled “Intellectual Property – Recent Developments and Implications,” at the World Biosimilar Congress in San Diego, California, on Wednesday, May 24, 2017. The 30-minute session covered: (1) the BPCIA’s “patent dance”; (2) what’s at stake in Sandoz v. Amgen, and the potential outcomes and practical implications of the
Last week, Celltrion, Inc. (“Celltrion”) filed two new petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 6,407,213 (“the ’213 patent”) related to Genentech’s Herceptin® (trastuzumab). Celltrion has announced that it plans to submit an application for a trastuzumab biosimilar product to the FDA this year (possibly as early as next month), as reported
Baxalta Incorporated and Baxalta GmbH (collectively “Baxalta” or “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on May 4, 2017, against Genentech, Inc. (“Genentech”) and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., (“Chugai,” and collectively with Genentech “Defendants”) alleging that Defendants’ bispecific monoclonal antibody emicizumab infringes claims 1, 4, 15, 17