RFEM’s Biosimilars IPR Dashboard provides current information on IPR proceedings related to proposed biosimilar products.
bevacizumab
District Judge Dismisses Amgen’s Declaratory Judgment Suit Over Avastin® Biosimilar
On February 2, 2018, U.S. District Judge George H. Wu granted Genentech’s motion to dismiss a complaint brought by Amgen in the Central District of California seeking a declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of twenty-seven patents related to Genentech’s cancer treatment biologic, Avastin® (bevacizumab).[i]
Judge Wu issued a tentative decision on January…
Litigation vs. Licensing: Manufacturers of the Two Most Recently Approved Biosimilars Take Different Approaches to Reference Drug Patents
The FDA has only approved eight biosimilar products to date. The second most recently approved biosimilar is Mvasi (bevacizumab-awwb), which is manufactured by Amgen and was approved as a biosimilar to Genentech’s Avastin (bevacizumab) on September 14, 2017.[1]
On October 6, 2017—about three weeks after the FDA approved Mvasi—Amgen provided Genentech with a notice…
The Impact of Biosimilars on Global Pharmaceutical Markets
Biologic drugs are quickly reshaping the pharmaceutical landscape as they dominate the drug market in annual sales revenue. Abbvie’s Humira® (adalimumab) rocketed to the best-selling drug in the world with sales generating over $16 billion USD in 2016. The top biologic drugs are all driving revenues well beyond the $1 billion sales revenue demarcation that…
FDA Advisory Committee Recommends Approval of CAR-T Cell Therapy and Two New Biosimilars
Novartis’ First CAR-T Cell Therapy Tisagenlecleucel (CTL019)
The FDA’s Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (“ODAC”) held a public meeting on Wednesday, July 12, 2017, to consider Novartis’ biologic license application (BLA 125646) for tisagenlecleucel (CTL019), an investigational chimeric antigen receptor T cell (“CAR-T”) therapy. Novartis is seeking approval of CTL019 for the treatment of patients from…
Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Announces Application for Humira® (Adalimumab) Biosimilar Accepted by EMA
Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics announced that its Medical Marketing Application (“MMA”) for FKB327, a biosimilar to AbbVie’s Humira® (adalimumab), has been accepted for review by the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”). Adalimumab is a TNF (tumor necrosis factor) inhibitor that binds to TNF-alpha (TNF-α), preventing it from activating TNF receptors, which cause the inflammatory reactions associated…
FDA Advisory Committee Meeting Announced for Amgen’s and Allergan’s Proposed Biosimilar to Avastin® (Bevacizumab)
The FDA announced yesterday that the Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (“ODAC”) has scheduled a public meeting to review ABP 215, Amgen’s proposed biosimilar to Genentech’s Avastin (bevacizumab), on July 13, 2017. According to the announcement, the proposed indications and uses for ABP 215 include:
- first- or second-line treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the
…
The Patent Dance Goes on for Genentech and Amgen Over Bevacizumab (Avastin®)
Genentech filed suit against Amgen this past February when a dispute arose between the parties during the first step of the “patent dance” for Amgen’s bevacizumab product (ABP 215), a proposed biosimilar to Genentech’s Avastin®. Genentech accused Amgen of violating sections (l)(2)(A) and (l)(1)(c) of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”), 42 U.S.C.…
PTAB Institutes First IPR on Bevacizumab Patent
Hospira, Inc. (“Hospira”) filed a petition with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) on September 9, 2016, for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 7,622,115 (“the ’115 patent”) related to Genentech’s Avastin® (bevacizumab). Interestingly, Genentech elected not to file a preliminary response. On March 16, 2017, the PTAB issued a decision…
Complaint in Genentech v. Amgen Dismissed Without Prejudice
Genentech’s lawsuit against Amgen has come to a quick (although perhaps temporary) end, with the Court dismissing Genentech’s complaint without prejudice on March 1, 2017 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in light of Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., 794 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2015). As discussed in our earlier post (which raised the…